Purdue Cooperative Extension Service
Issue 5, April 28, 2017 • USDA-NIFA Extension IPM Grant
Plant parasitic nematodes are microscopic worm-like organisms that require water to survive and are sensitive to high temperature. Only living nematodes can be extracted from roots. Through the years we have had many samples submitted to the Purdue Nematology Laboratory with little consistency in the quality of the samples. We have discussed proper sampling procedures at every opportunity but not exclusively until now. Sampling might appear trivial but we believe proper sampling is the most crucial step for correct diagnosis. Because we continue to receive improper samples we address this issue again via this article. Even though procedures for sampling among the most important plant parasitic nematodes are similar, there are differences based on the host and the type of nematodes we are trying to recover.
Corn parasitic nematodes: There are three major groups of nematodes that parasitize corn.
Soybean parasitic nematodes: Lesion and Lance nematodes parasitize soybean too but Needle nematode does not. The sampling procedure for these nematodes in soybean is similar to the one described for corn. The most economically important nematode affecting soybean is the Soybean Cyst Nematode (SCN). The SCN distribution, as for most of the plant parasitic nematodes, is in patches. So it is very important to take many sub-samples to increase possibility of hitting the concentrated areas. A soil probe or a small trowel should be used to collect the sub-samples. Most of these nematodes are within 6-8 inches of the soil. One sample for every 10 acres is ideal. A quart of soil is sufficient and no root samples are required for SCN. Samples can be taken anytime.
Recommended Optimum Sampling Type and Time for Major Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Indiana. |
---|
Host | Target Nematode | Sample Type | Optimum Time to Sample |
---|---|---|---|
Corn |
Needle |
Soil and roots |
June-mid July |
Corn |
Lesion, Lance |
Soil and roots |
Late June-Late August |
Soybean |
Lesion, Lance |
Soil and roots |
Late June-Late August |
Soybean |
SCN |
Soil |
Anytime |
Turf |
All |
Soil and roots |
June and September |
Melons |
Root knot |
Roots |
At harvest |
Mint |
Lesion |
Roots and soil |
Late June-September |
Mint |
Needle |
Roots and soil |
Late Spring or early fall |
Mint |
Root knot |
Roots |
Fall |
County/Cooperator | Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 6 | Wk 7 | Wk 8 | Wk 9 | Wk 10 | Wk 11 | Wk 12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dubois/SIPAC Ag Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101 | 193 | 16 | ||||||
Jennings/SEPAC Ag Center | 0 | 1 | 1 | 56 | 57 | 9 | ||||||
Knox/SWPAC Ag Center | 0 | 13 | 26 | 42 | 189 | 57 | ||||||
LaPorte/Pinney Ag Center | 0 | 0 | 3 | 352 | 936 | 382 | ||||||
Lawrence/Feldun Ag Center | 4 | 108 | 216 | 246 | 650 | 348 | ||||||
Randolph/Davis Ag Center | 0 | 29 | 41 | 528 | 1232 | 300 | ||||||
Tippecanoe/Meigs | 0 | 2 | 15 | 107 | 730 | 243 | ||||||
Whitley/NEPAC Ag Center | 0 | 34 | 90 | 537 | 1689 | 1349 |
Wk 1 = 3/16/17 - 3/22/17; Wk 2 = 3/23/17 - 3/29/17; Wk 3 - 3/30/17 - 4/5/17; Wk 4 - 4/7/18 - 4/12/17; Wk 5 - 4/13/17 - 4/19/17
County | Cooperator | BCW Trapped | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1
|
Week 2 3/30/17-4/5/17 |
Week 3 4/5/17-4/12/17 | Week 5 - 4/13/17 - 4/19/17 | Week 6 - 4/20/17-4/26/17 | ||
Adams | Kaminsky/New Era Ag | 13 | 35 | |||
Adams | Roe/Mercer Landmark | 11 | 17* | 7 | 42 | 28* |
Allen | Anderson/Syngenta Seed | 0 | ||||
Allen | Gynn/Southwind Farms | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 21* |
Allen | Kneubuhler/G&K Concepts - Trap 1 | 0 | 19* | 36 | 60* | |
Allen | Kneubuhler/G&K Concepts - Trap 2 | 9 | 2 | 0 | ||
Bartholomew | Bush/Pioneer Hybrids | 1 | 13* | 13 | 17 | 28* |
Clay | Bower/Ceres Solutions - Clay City | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
Clay | Bower/Ceres Solutions - Bowling Green | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Clay | Bower/Ceres Solutions - Brazil | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Clinton | Emanuel/Boone Co. CES | 8 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 5 |
DeKalb | Hoffman/ATA Solutions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Dubois | Eck/Purdue CES | 14 | 28* | 41* | 4 | 4 |
Elkhart | Kauffman/Crop Tech Inc. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 28* |
Fayette | Schelle/Falmouth Farm Supply Inc. | 5 | 33* | 5 | 3 | |
Fountain | Mroczkiewicz/Syngenta | 7 | 18* | 31* | 93* | 43* |
Fulton | Jenkins/N. Central Coop - Talma | 0 | 5 | 10 | 13 | 6 |
Fulton | Ranstead/NCC Coop - Rochester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
Gibson | Schmitz/Gibson Co. CES | 0 | 0 | |||
Hamilton | Campbell/Beck's Hybrids | 14 | 13 | 18 | 55* | 30* |
Hamilton | Truster/Reynolds Farm Equipment | 1 | 1 | |||
Hendricks | Nicholson/Nicholson Consulting | 0 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 17* |
Jasper | Overstreet/Jasper Purdue CES | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 10 |
Jasper | Ritter/Brodbeck Seeds | 1 | 3 | 10 | 32 | 28* |
Jay | Boyer/Davis PAC | 3 | 14 | 19 | 19 | |
Jay | Shrack/Ran-Del Agri Services | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
Jay | Temple/Jay County CES | |||||
Jennings | Bauerle/SEPAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Knox | Bower/Ceres Solutions - Freelandville | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13* | 4 |
Knox | Bower/Ceres Solutions - Vincennes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
Kosciusko | Klotz/Etna Green | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 5 |
Lake | Kleine/Kleine Farms | 4 | 16* | 60* | 83* | 90* |
Lake | Moyer/Dekalb Hybrids - Shelby | 5 | 5 | 20* | 27 | 6 |
Lake | Moyer/Dekalb Hybrids - Schneider | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 20 |
LaPorte | Rocke/Agri-Mgmt Solutions | 4 | 41 | 9 | ||
Madison | Truster/Reynolds Farm Equipment | 0 | ||||
Marshall | Harrell/Harrell Ag Services | 0 | ||||
Marshall | Klotz/SR 10 & SR 331 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Marshall | Miller/North Central Coop | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Miami | Early/Pioneer Hybrids | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Newton | Moyer/Dekalb Hybrids - Lake Village | 2 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 8 |
Porter | Leuck/PPAC | 5 | 3 | 18 | 25 | 8 |
Pulaski | Capouch/M&R Ag Services | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Pulaski | Leman/North Central Coop | 0 | 10 | 21 | 30* | |
Putnam | Nicholson/Nicholson Consulting | 2 | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
Randolph | Boyer/DPAC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Rush | Schelle/Falmouth Farm Supply Inc. | 6 | 10 | 1 | 3 | |
Shelby | Fisher/Shelby County Co-op | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
Shelby | Simpson/Simpson Farms | 7 | 49* | 41* | 67* | 37 |
Starke | Capouch/M&R Ag Services | 0 | 0 | 6 | 28 | 21* |
Starke | Wickert/Wickert Consulting - California Twnshp | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 11 |
Starke | Wickert/Wickert Consulting - Railroad Twnshp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
St. Joseph | Barry/Helena | 1 | 3 | 15* | ||
Sullivan | Bower/Ceres Solutions - Farmersburg | 0 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 18* |
Sullivan | Bower/Ceres Solutions - Sullivan | 6 | 21* | 14* | 16* | 6 |
Tippecanoe | Bower/Ceres Solutions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
Tippecanoe | Westerfield/Monsanto Research Farm | 0 | 0 | 13 | 11 | 16 |
Tippecanoe | Nagel/Ceres Solutions | 30 | 47* | 44* | 89 | 14 |
Tippecanoe | Obermeyer/Purdue Entomology | 2 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 20* |
Tipton | Campbell/Beck's Hybrids | 10 | 17 | 11 | 73* | 33* |
Vermillion | Bower/Ceres Solutions | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Wabash | Enyeart/North Central Coop | 0 | ||||
Whitley | Walker, Richards/NEPAC1 - Main | 10 | 28* | 37* | 81* | 87* |
Whitley | Walker, Richards/NEPAC2 - Kyler | 3 | 8 | 17* | 36* | 33* |
* = Intensive Capture...this occurs when 9 or more moths are caught over a 2-night period
Wheat growth stages vary greatly across the state, but as wheat is flowering in southern Indiana, or approaching flowering, it is important to consider the risk for Fusarium head blight (FHB), or scab, development.
The fungus that causes FHB, Fusarium graminearium, infects wheat during flowering, beginning at FGS 10.5.1. Symptoms appear later in the season and include bleached spikelets on the head (Figure 1), and small or shriveled grain kernels, commonly called “tombstones”. The fungus also produces mycotoxins, such as deoxynivalenol, or DON, which can accumulate in the infected grain.
Rainy, warm, and humid weather conditions favor disease development. It will be critical to watch the FHB risk assessment tool to assess the risk of Fusarium head blight in Indiana as wheat enters flowering over the next few weeks across the state. This model can be accessed through the following link: http://www.wheatscab.psu.edu/. This model uses weather information including temperature, rainfall, and relative humidity to calculate risk levels for FHB. The model has been updated in recent years, and now also includes an option to predict risk based on variety susceptibility to FHB. Keep in mind that the model does not provide a guaranteed prediction for whether or not FHB will occur in individual fields, and additional factors such as the local weather forecast, crop conditions, and Extension commentary should be considered when assessing the level of risk. Farmers and crop advisors can sign up for alerts courtesy of the U.S. Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative. Alerts can be sent to a cell phone or email, and will be sent out as the risk map updates risk of scab in Indiana. To sign up for alerts, visit: http://scabusa.org/fhb_alert.php.
If varieties susceptible to FHB have been planted, or farmers are worried about the risk of FHB development, they may want to consider a fungicide application at early flowering for suppression of FHB. Indiana research indicates that applications of the fungicides Prosaro and Caramba are most effective at managing FHB if they are applied at early flowering. Other products are available, but may not be as effective. Fungicides in the quinone-outside inhibitin (QoI) class (commonly called strobilurins) are not labeled for Fusarium head blight suppression. To accurately growth stage wheat and determine when wheat is beginning to flower, please see Purdue Extension publication ID-422 “Managing Wheat by Growth Stage”.
The foliar disease stripe rust (Figure 2) has been observed in fields in southern IN, but is still at relatively low levels. Purdue Extension Bulletin BP-79-W, “Identifying Rust Diseases of Wheat and Barley” is available to aid in diagnosis of stripe rust. It is important to consider variety susceptibility to stripe rust, growth stage, and disease spread before applying a fungicide for stripe rust management. Fungicides applied at flowering for FHB suppression will also provide some level of protection from foliar disease on the flag leaf. If farmers are considering a foliar fungicide application for stripe rust through boot stage, they should keep in mind that applications made prior to flowering will NOT suppress FHB or the associated mycotoxin deoxynivalenol, or DON. If the risk for FHB increases after foliar fungicide applications occur, it may be necessary to make another application at flowering for FHB suppression.
Purdue Extension Entomology
901 W. State Street
West Lafayette, IN, 47907
(765) 494-8761
luck@purdue.edu
@PurdueExtEnt
PurdueEntomology
If you would like to be alerted by e-mail when the current issue of the Pest&Crop is available on-line, please enter your e-mail address and click the submit button.
It is the policy of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action institution. This material may be available in alternative formats.