Purdue Cooperative Extension Service
Issue 18, July 28, 2017 • USDA-NIFA Extension IPM Grant
This year’s Western Bean Cutworm (WBC) flight in northern Indiana counties has been quite impressive. Though it is not over, by looking at the moth captures the past couple weeks (see report) we are past peak flight. Most eggs have been laid by this point, and there were many. We are aware that many fields have been scouted, found over the 5% threshold, and subsequently treated with insecticide. In the next weeks, folks will be out to determine the extent of damaged ears, if any, are present in fields. The distinguishing characteristics between mature western bean cutworm and corn earworm (CEW) larvae are found below. It is a little trickier to determine species when the larvae are small, i.e., early instars. For small caterpillars, you must use skin texture: WBC being smooth and CEW being bumpy. This requires a 10X magnifying lens. Not to add to the confusion, but there are a couple other caterpillars, fall armyworm and European corn borer, that also may be found in the ear. For now though, we will keep it to the two most likely suspects. As we enter later summer, caterpillars will be larger, more obvious and easier to tell apart. We will check back in at that time with another report. Happy scouting!
• Beetle damage usually looks far worse than it is.
• Corn and soybean damage and treatment guidelines are given.
Japanese beetles have been seen throughout the state for several weeks, some are reporting very high numbers. Though adult emergence is past peak, there is still concern to field crop producers and (especially) homeowners. The one important thing to remember when it comes to Japanese beetles – their presence and damage almost always looks worse than it is.
Field Corn: Japanese beetle feed on corn leaves, tassels, and silks. Generally, leaf and tassel feeding can be ignored. If beetles are present and feeding on corn silks, an insecticide should be applied only if on average the silks are being cut off to less than 1/2 inch before 50% pollination has taken place. This rarely happens on a field-wide basis. Edges are typically at much higher levels than the rest of the field, so don’t let that dictate treatments. Also, don’t be overly excited by this pest’s tendency to clump on a few ears within an area and eat the silks down to the husks. With sufficient soil moisture (not a problem in most of the state this year), silks will grow from 1/2 to 1 inch per day during the one to two weeks of pollen shed. Silks only need to be peeking out of the husk to receive pollen. Besides, beetles are often attracted to silks that have already completed the fertilization process even though they are still somewhat yellow. Check for pollen shed and silk feeding in several areas of the field. Don’t be overly influenced by what you think you may see from windshield surveys! Get out into fields to determine beetle activity.
Soybean: Soybean plants have the amazing ability to withstand considerable leaf damage (defoliation) before yield is impacted. The impact of defoliation is greatest during pod fill because of the importance of leaf area to photosynthesis, and ultimately to yield. Therefore, greater than 15% defoliation during pod fill can be tolerated before yields are economically affected. This defoliation must occur across the whole plant, not just the upper canopy. The beetles often congregate in areas of a field where they are first attracted to weeds such as smartweed and velvetleaf. As in the case of corn, don’t be overly alarmed by these bright, iridescent beetles feeding on soybean plants near field edges. Consider that as they feed their defoliation allows for better sunlight penetration into the lower plant canopy!
However, should controls be needed, refer to publications:
Corn Insect Control Recommendations
https://extension.entm.purdue.edu/publications/E-219/E-219.html
Soybean Insect Control Recommendations
https://extension.entm.purdue.edu/publications/E-77/E-77.html
County | Cooperator | WBC Trapped | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 6/22/17 - 6/28/17 |
Week 2 6/29/17 - 7/5/17 |
Week 3 7/6/17 - 7/12/17 |
Week 4 7/13/17 - 7/19/17 |
Week 5 7/20/17 - 7/26/17 |
||||
Adams | Kaminsky/New Era Ag | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 5 | ||
Adams | Roe/Mercer Landmark | 0 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||
Allen | Anderson/Syngenta Seed | 0 | 4 | 26 | 34 | 14 | ||
Allen | Gynn/Southwind Farms | 0 | 8 | 13 | 15 | 19 | ||
Allen | Kneubuhler/G&K Concepts/Harlan | 0 | 4 | 13 | 4 | |||
Allen | Kneubuhler/G&K Concepts/Koch | 0 | 10 | 0 | 4 | |||
Bartholomew | Bush/Pioneer Hybrids | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Clay | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Clay City | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Clay | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Brazil | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Clinton | Emanuel/Boone Co. CES | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
Clinton | Foster/Purdue Entomology | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||
DeKalb | Hoffman/ATA Solutions | 87 | 174 | 167 | ||||
Dubois | Eck/Purdue CES | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
Elkhart | Kauffman/Crop Tech Inc. | 35 | 156 | 150 | 95 | |||
Fayette | Schelle/Falmouth Farm Supply Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Fountain | Mroczkiewicz/Syngenta | 41 | 31 | 14 | 4 | 0 | ||
Fulton | Jenkins/N. Central Coop/Talma | 379 | 385 | 167 | 76 | 5 | ||
Fulton | Ranstead/N. Central Coop/Rochester | 309 | 46 | |||||
Gibson | Schmitz/Gibson Co. CES | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||
Hamilton | Campbell/Beck's Hybrids | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Hendricks | Nicholson/Nicholson Consulting | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
Jasper | Overstreet/Purdue CES | 438 | 410 | 304 | 237 | 103 | ||
Jasper | Ritter/Brodbeck Seeds | 302 | 171 | 124 | 97 | 14 | ||
Jay | Boyer/Davis PAC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |||
Jay | Shrack/Ran Del Agri Services | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
Jay | Temple/Jay County CES/Pennville | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | ||
Jay | Temple/Jay County CES/Redkey | 3 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | ||
Jennings | Bauerle/SEPAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
Knox | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Vincennes | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Knox | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Freelandville | 0 | 0 | |||||
Kosciusko | Klotz/Etna Green | 75 | 112 | 92 | 46 | |||
Lake | Kleine/Kleine Farms | 0 | 4 | 41 | 11 | 0 | ||
Lake | Moyer/Dekalb Hybrids, Shelby | 157 | 108 | 63 | 16 | 20 | ||
Lake | Moyer/Dekalb Hybrids, Schneider | 246 | 151 | 101 | 93 | 63 | ||
LaPorte | Rocke/Agri-Mgmt Solutions, Wanatah | 120 | 122 | 321 | 138 | 10 | ||
LaPorte | Smith/Co-Alliance/LaPorte | 0 | 11 | 29 | 22 | 7 | ||
LaPorte | Smith/Co-Alliance/Fish Lake | 6 | 20 | 109 | 107 | 115 | ||
LaPorte | Smith/Co-Alliance/Union Mills | 15 | 19 | 122 | 100 | 40 | ||
LaPorte | Smith/Co-Alliance/LaCrosse | 35 | 149 | 337 | 112 | 17 | ||
Marshall | Harrell/Harrell Ag Services | 4 | 118 | 149 | 6 | |||
Marshall | Klotz/SR 10 & SR 331 | 29 | 81 | 130 | 90 | 13 | ||
Marshall | Miller/North Central Coop | 48 | 43 | 10 | ||||
Miami | Early/Pioneer Hybrids | 189 | 216 | 140 | 154 | 9 | ||
Newton | Moyer/Dekalb Hybrids, Lake Village | 16 | 139 | 262 | 193 | 32 | ||
Porter | Leuck/PPAC | 11 | 17 | 335 | 287 | 68 | ||
Pulaski | Capouch/M&R Ag Services | 42 | 49 | 94 | 50 | 20 | ||
Pulaski | Leman/North Central Coop | 4 | 22 | 34 | ||||
Putnam | Nicholson/Nicholson Consulting | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||||
Randolph | Boyer/DPAC | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |||
Rush | Schelle/Falmouth Farm Supply Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Shelby | Fisher/Shelby Co. Co-Op | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Shelby | Simpson/Simpson Farms | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
Starke | Capouch/M&R Ag Services | 0 | 184 | 246 | 10 | 7 | ||
Starke | David Wickert/Wickert Consulting | 5 | 28 | 21 | 10 | 4 | ||
Starke | Larry Wickert/Wickert Consulting | 136 | 292 | 185 | 16 | 4 | ||
St. Joseph | Barry/Helena | 3 | 28 | 108 | 56 | 26 | ||
St. Joseph | Gary Battles | 1 | 12 | 16 | 16 | 10 | ||
St. Joseph | Carbiener/Union Twp. | 0 | 11 | 50 | 19 | 7 | ||
St. Joseph | Smith/Co-Alliance/Granger | 7 | 46 | 87 | 69 | 95 | ||
St. Joseph | Smith/Co-Alliance/New Carlisle | 0 | 3 | 69 | 93 | 109 | ||
Sullivan | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Farmersburg | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Tippecanoe | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Sullivan | 0 | 8 | 0 | ||||
Tippecanoe | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Lafayette | 15 | 25 | 24 | ||||
Tippecanoe | Nagel/Ceres Solutions | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||
Tippecanoe | Obermeyer/Purdue Entomology | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Tippecanoe | Westerfeld/Monsanto | 2 | 3 | 0 | ||||
Tipton | Campbell/Beck's Hybrids | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Vermillion | Bower/Ceres Solutions/Clinton | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Wabash | Enyeart/North Central Coop | 1 | 10 | 15 | 4 | |||
Whitley | Richards/NEPAC | 23 | 70 | 39 | 13 | 5 | ||
Whitley | Richards/NEPAC | 182 | 101 | 23 |
Southern rust of corn, caused by the fungus Puccinia polysora, has been detected in several Indiana counties (Figure 1). The detection of southern rust is earlier than normal, and has caused concern because there are many acres of late planted or re-planted corn in the state in 2017 that have the potential to be impacted by the disease. However, whether or not southern rust will develop into a disease of concern will largely depend on the weather.
Southern rust can be a damaging disease, and foliar fungicide applications between tassel (VT) and milk (R3) can help protect plants from infection and disease development. However, it is important to consider corn growth stage AND weather conditions before deciding on a fungicide application. If the weather is hot, (mid-80s and above), humid, and there are heavy dews and rainfall, then southern rust may develop and spread more quickly. Cooler, less humid weather will cause the disease to develop and spread slowly.
Yield potential should also be a consideration, and high-yield potential fields should be prioritized when making management decisions. Farmers trying to decide if a fungicide application is warranted can scout fields carefully and frequently and watch the weather to determine if and when a fungicide application is needed.
There are several fungicides available that provide very good control of southern rust. Fungicide efficacy of specific fungicide products for corn diseases are described in the updated fungicide efficacy table for management of corn diseases, which is developed by the national Corn Disease Working Group: http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/BP/BP-160-W.pdf.
Just remember that common rust, caused by Puccinia sorghi, and southern rust are easy diseases to confuse, and any suspected samples should be sent to the Purdue Plant and Pest Diagnostic Laboratory (PPDL) for confirmation before deciding on a management tactic. Weather conditions have favored continued development of common rust, but fungicide applications for common rust in hybrid corn are unlikely to be economically beneficial.
The Purdue Extension publication "Diseases of Corn: Common and Southern Rust" has more information on distinguishing between common and southern rust, and additional details on both diseases.
Purdue Extension Entomology
901 W. State Street
West Lafayette, IN, 47907
(765) 494-8761
luck@purdue.edu
@PurdueExtEnt
PurdueEntomology
If you would like to be alerted by e-mail when the current issue of the Pest&Crop is available on-line, please enter your e-mail address and click the submit button.
It is the policy of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action institution. This material may be available in alternative formats.